by Manuel Alvarez-Rivera: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Preliminary projections of yesterday's legislative election in Serbia have the right-wing nationalist Serbian Radical Party (SRS) coming up once again as the largest party in the country's National Assembly (Parliament), although well short of an absolute majority.
The Centre for Free Election and Democracy (CeSID), a NGO that monitors voting in Serbia elections, estimates SRS will obtain 81 of 250 seats in the National Assembly - one fewer than in 2003. However, the Radicals' share of the vote actually increased slightly with respect to the preceding election, according to CeSID.
Meanwhile, the left-of-center Democratic Party (DS) of President Boris Tadic scored substantial gains and is expected to take 65 seats (up from 37 in 2003), displacing the conservative Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) of Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica (47 seats, down from 53 in 2003) as Serbia's second-largest party.
Both the right-liberal G17 Plus and the leftist Socialist Party of Serbia (the party of the late strongman Slobodan Milosevic) lost ground in the election but retained their parliamentary representation, with 19 and 16 seats, respectively (down from 34 and 22 in the last election).
At the time of writing, a four-party, center-left coalition led by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) appeared to have narrowly crossed the five percent threshold and secured 15 seats, but Vuk Draskovic's Serbian Renewal Movement (SPO) has been wiped out, losing all of its National Assembly seats.
CeSID's figures come very close to updated preliminary results made available by Serbia's Republic Electoral Commission. According to the Commission, 62.6% of the electorate turned out to vote in the country's first parliamentary election since the breakup of the state union with Montenegro.
If these estimates are confirmed by definitive results (expected in four days), DSS will hold the balance of power in the new National Assembly. As such, it could form a majority coalition government with the main pro-European parties - DS and G17 Plus - or it could opt for a right-wing partnership with SRS, which would hold a narrow parliamentary majority. Both the Radicals and DSS are staunchly opposed to the independence of the overwhelmingly ethnic Albanian province of Kosovo - administered by the United Nations since 1999 - and DSS leader Kostunica has not ruled out an alliance with SRS.....
Editorial note: Manuel is the power behind the throne at the site Election Resources on the Internet, and will be offering coverage of election results - as and when they come in - here on Global Economy Matters.
Update
Serbia's Republic Electoral Commission reports definitive results of the National Assembly election held last January 21 were as follows after voting was subsequently repeated in six polling stations:
Serbian Radical Party - 1,153,453 votes (28.6%), 81 seats
Democratic Party - 915,854 votes (22.7%), 64 seats
Democratic Party of Serbia - New Serbia - 667,615 votes (16.6%), 47 seats
G17 Plus - 275,041 votes (6.8%), 19 seats
Socialist Party of Serbia - 227,580 votes (5.6%), 16 seats
Liberal Democratic Party - Civic Alliance of Serbia - Social Democratic Union - League of Vojvodina Social Democrats - 214,262 votes (5.3%), 15 seats
Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians - 52,510 votes (1.3%), 3 seats
List for Sandzak Coalition - 33,823 votes (0.8%), 2 seats
Roma Union of Serbia - 17,128 votes (0.4%), 1 seat
Coalition of Presevo Valley Albanians - 16,973 votes (0.4%), 1 seat
Roma Party - 14,631 votes (0.4%), 1 seat
Serbian Renewal Movement - 134,147 votes (3.3%), no seats
Others - 244,318 votes (6.1%), no seats
In addition, there were 65,468 invalid ballots - 1.6% of the total number of votes cast. Voter turnout in the election stood at 60.6%.
The election's final results showed little change with respect to preliminary figures and estimates published on election night. In terms of parliamentary mandates, the Democratic Party lost a single seat to the Coalition of Presevo Valley Albanians, but the number of seats for the remaining parties stood unchanged.
Serbian President Boris Tadic started official consultations with parliamentary parties last January 29. Following the consultations, he was expected to propose a candidate for prime minister. However, as of early May no agreement had been reached on the formation of a new government in the three-and-a-half months since the election was held. Should that have continued to be the case by May 15, it would have been necessary to hold another parliamentary election.
In the meantime, on Tuesday, May 8, 2007, the Radicals, Kostunica's Democratic Party of Serbia and the Socialist Party of Serbia joined forces to elect Tomislav Nikolic of the Serbian Radical Party as Speaker of the National Assembly. As such, the ultranationalist Radicals, who became the largest party in Serbia earlier this year - like the Nazis did in Weimar Germany seventy-five years ago - now had one of their own as Speaker of Parliament - again, like the Nazis, who had Hermann Goering elected as president of the Reichstag in 1932, a few months before Adolf Hitler rose to power...
However, just as Serbia appeared inexorably headed towards an early election, DS, DSS-NS and G17 Plus reached a last-minute agreement to form a new government, 109 days after the election was held. Under the terms of the agreement, Kostunica will remain head of government, and DSS-NS will be in charge of the following portfolios: Internal Affairs, Energy, Infrastructure, Kosovo and Metohija, Trade, Education and Religion. Meanwhile, DS will have a Vice President for European Integration and the following ministries: Finance, Defense, Foreign Affairs, Agriculture, Justice, Telecommunications and IT, Labor and Social Policy, State Administration and Local Self-Government, Environment, Culture, Diaspora, and a minister without portfolio for the National Investment Plan. Finally, G17 Plus will run the following ministries: Economy and Regional Development, Health, Science, Youth and Sport.
In addition, Tomislav Nikolic has stepped down as Speaker of the National Assembly; as part of the coalition agreement, his successor will be from the Democratic Party.
Sunday, January 21, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Special Feature, The German Economy At A Glance
Welcome to the Global Economy Matters Blog. Below you will find the normal chronological blog posts. But first here is our Monthly Special Feature which in January 2008 focuses on Germany. Here you will find charts which provide background data on the German economy. We hope these will be of some help to the first time reader here, making it easier to contextualise, assess and get to grips with the general argument being presented on the blog. The big question which arose concerning the Germany economy in 2007 was whether or not the new found dynamism in German economic activity constituted some form of remaissance, and formed part of a global decoupling process whereby a sustainable recovery in domestic demand was taking place. Analysts on this blog never really accepted this view. The key question and central enigma associated with the German economy is really why domestic demand should have remained so congenitally weak over such a considerable period of time.
Since this phenomenon is also to be observed in the the two other societes with very high (circa 43) population median ages - Italy and Japan - we postulate that demographics and population ageing processes offer some part of the explanation here.
Basically what we can observe as societies move above the 40 median age mark are a number of stylised facts. Weakness in domestic private consumption would be one of these, absence of consumer credit driven property booms would be another, growing pressure on the national debt as the elderly dependence ratio steadily rises would be another, and growing dependence on export growth for sustaining GDP growth would be the central feature of the whole edifice.
We hope you will find the background data presented here useful in assessing the argument which we are presenting on this blog, which is basically that a key component in the longer term growth stagnation from which Germany is suffering has its roots in the underlying demographics. Basically and in the long run (possibly with a 30 year lag) fertility does matter. Please click on thumbnails for better viewing.
What follows is a very rough and ready attempt to describe in broad brush strokes how the contemporary German economy actually works. First off, and as is well known, German society is ageing, and at the same time the German population has started declining. Not only is Germany's median age rising, the proportion of the population in the key 25-49 age group is now falling.
As can be seen from the chart this crucial age group touched its highpoint in 1997/98. This could be thought of as the moment of maximum capacity for the German economy since it includes the crucial 25 to 40 household-former, first-time-homebuyer group. In terms of credit expansion, it is this group which drives a significant part of internal demand.
The age group also includes another important group, the 35 to 50 years one. This group drives an economy in productive terms, since these are the prime age workers. If you think of a society as a 100 metres sprint athlete, then there is an age when this athlete is at the maximum of his or her running potential, an age after which each time they can only run the 100 metres more slowly.
Well a society is the same in terms of its collective economic potential, without addressing underlying issues either through fertility or immigration, it can only move forward more and more slowly. Consumption becomes flat, and GDP growth - gioven the external dependence - fragile.
Private consumption has hovered pretty close to the 60% mark for many years now, while government consumption - after moving sharply upwards as a total share in the first half of the 1970s has subsequently remained pretty constant, moving around the 19% of GDP mark. The big difference has been in the importance of fixed capital formation (GFCF) which reached from 1975 to 2000hovered around the 22 - 24% of GDP mark.
Prior to 1975 GFCF was at a much higher level, while post 2000 it has dropped substantially And So what we can see is that the year between, say, 1975 and 2000, when GFCF remaind a more or less constant share of GDP, constituted - to use the language of neo-classical economics - the constant growth period of the German domestic economy.The years prior to 1975 were the convergence, or "catch-up" years
And especially the 1960s, after Germany finally broke out of the destruction and devastation of WWII - while the years after 2000 constitute what the neo-classicists would call the "balanced growth period", although as we can see, it isn't very balanced, and there certainly isn't a steady state.
2008 Forecasts: There is a consenus at the present time that the German economy is slowing. Where there is no real consensus is over the rate at which it is slowing and where and when it will settle. It is clear that GDP growth in 2007 will be below the heady 3.1% annual rate achieved in 2006. The OECD last December revised their 2007 German forecast down to 2.6%, and their 2008 one down to 1.8%. The IMF in their October World Economic Outlook forecast growth for 2007 at 2.4%, slowing to 2% in 2008. Morgan Stanley's Elga Bartsch, while optimistic that the German economy will whether the credit crunch better than most (and here she may well be right) is somewhat more sanguine, putting 2008 growth at 1.5%. In general though I rather doubt her overview that "Germany could well be on the way to becoming the new growth locomotive in Europe." and especially her suggestion that "the phase of underperformance in terms of GDP growth, which has plagued Europe’s largest economy for years, is clearly over." Unfortunately, what we are arguing on this blog is that Germany's GDP growth rates since the mid 1990s are not some special kind of "underperformance", but what can be expected from a society with a rapidly rising median age which is increasingly dependent on exports rather than domestic consumption for growth.
The EU commission in it's November 2007 forecast was also convinced that the German economy was now on a "solid growth path", forecasting 2.5% growth for 2007 and 2.1% for 2008.
I personally will be very surprised if we see growth in the region of 2% for the German economy in 2008, and I even consider the 1.8% from the OECD and 1.5% from Morgan Stanley still on the high side given the extent of downside risk. Basically the reasonably favourable depreciation rules which currently apply to German investment have been changed as of 1 January 2008, and we might reasonably expect to see some sort of impact on investment comparable with the negative shock which hit private domestic consumption following the VAT rise on 1 Jan 2007. In addition all the indications suggest that German consumption will continue to be weak in 2008. So if consumer consumption is at best flat, governemnt consumption equally so, and investment and construction weakening, we are simply lefy with export growth, and here the outlook is definitely more negative in 2008 than it was in 2007. The Spanish economy (one important German customer) is visibly wilting by the day, as is the UK (another big customer), but it is to Eastern Europe we must look for the biggest impact on German exports of any correction in 2008. Just one data point should suffice, Germany exports roughly the same value of goods to the Czech Republic (and more to Poland) as it does to China. This means that Geramny is proportionately not that exposed to any slowdown in China, but hugely exposed to any sudden shift in growth and demand in the East of Europe.
So I would say, that on current data, 1% growth in Germany in 2008 look a reasonable estimate at this point, but that this needs to be taken to mean with considerable downside risk. Germany is now tremendously dependent on what happens elsewhere, and until what does actually happen elsewhere becomes clearer it is difficult to be more precise on Germany.
The only apparent bright spot on the horizon is employment, but I am dubious that in the context of Germany's ageing workforce this will work through as some are hoping, as I expain at some considerable length in this post here. My opinion is that Germany will enter recession at some point during 2008, and that we may well have 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth. The continuing high euro will maintain pressure on German exports, and high oil and food prices will maintain pressure on the inflation front, at least in the first half of 2008. The ECB will probably switch stance towards rate reductions at some point, but since, as Elga Bartsch among many others so eloquently argues German internal consumption and investment are not especially dependent on credit conditions, easing from the ECB may not have as much impact as one would hope for.
Key Posts For Understanding The Present Path of the German Economy
Is The German Economy Heading For Recession in 2008?
Employment and Unemployment in Germany January 2008
Germany Economy, What Price the VAT Effect Now!
The German Economy, Employment, Export Shares and Age Structure
Structural Aspects of German Export Dependence
Does NeoClassical Steady State Growth Really Exist?
0 comments:
Post a Comment